previous by date | index | next by date |
previous in topic | topic list |
>any
> I agree after the Jupiter series I never had a real desire to buy
> of their synths.and it
> I agree also the Jupiter 8 is definitely the Rolls Royce of Roland.
> I did some programming for the factory patches on the Jupiter 6
> didn't have near the warmth as the 8 but it was still a greatsynth.
> Yeah I agree they market these quasi analog machines because theyknow
> analog is what everyone wants and if they can't get the real thingthey
> figure they will settle for anything packaged like the old stuff.line
> I sure would like to see Roland and other manufacturers do vintage
> of synths where the rebuild the old stuff close to the same specs.would
> They could take advantage of new technologies in the areas that
> not affect the sound.much
> Look what Moog did with the Voyager and now the Little Phatty.
>
> Good Luck on your repairs and do keep us posted on the progress.
> Dana
>
> Hi Dana,I just returned from Roland Belgium.They are gonna do as
> asBelgian
> they can!
> DID YOU KNOW that the big boss of Roland (Japan) visited the
> RolandMACHINES
> factory,and he DOESN'T WANT THAT ROLAND KEEPS FIXING OLD
> anymore!!!Roland :-)
> So I was one of the last ones to have an old synth fixed at
> WhenRoland" :-)
> I came in the technician said : Aaahhh,the Rolls Royce of
> I find it a bit hypocrit : they don't want to fix the machinesthat
> made)
> Roland big but on the other hand they name their new machines
> sh201,MC808
> etcetc....All the same crappy softsynths in different packages :-
> I!ll keep you informed if my Jupitter survives,if not somethinginside
> me
> will die :-)
> Cheeersss and thanks for the super info!
> -Visit Dana's Synth Site
> http://members.cox.net/synths
>