Archive of the former Yahoo!Groups mailing list: All about the Roland Jupiter-series

previous by date index next by date
  topic list next in topic

Subject: FW: [AH] Juno-106 vs. JP-8000 (was Jupiter 6 vs. JP-8000)

From: "Verschut, Ricardo" <Ricardo_Verschut@...
Date: 1999-06-28

-----Original Message-----
From: Chad Gould [mailto:Chad_Gould@...]
Sent: Monday, June 28, 1999 4:08 PM
To: 'analogue@...'
Subject: RE: [AH] Juno-106 vs. JP-8000 (was Jupiter 6 vs. JP-8000)

> I'd assume up-front that there's some original character in the 106
> there's SOOO many artists who still use the thing. That plus it sold well
> when new, and it's a reliable synth.

There is character in a Juno 106, too bad the character is very limited in
variety. (:

> Simply put - can a JP-8000 do a reasonable job at the 106 sounds?

Pretty reasonable. Actually the Nord Lead does a better Juno 106, I think. I
don't think the JP-6 does (it can... with work... but it isn't as
slippery-sounding as the 106...)..