Archive of the former Yahoo!Groups mailing list: All about the Roland Jupiter-series

previous by date index next by date
previous in topic topic list  

Subject: FW: [AH] Q: mks-80 vs. jp8: help me

From: "Verschut, Ricardo" <ricardo.verschut@...>
Date: 2000-06-27

-----Original Message-----
From: Mike Kent
Subject: Re: [AH] Q: mks-80 vs. jp8: help me



I've owned 3 MKS-80 (2 with programmers) and 3 Jupiter-8. I now own 1
excellent/mint JP-8 and 1 handyman's nightmare JP-8. MKS-80s are all gone.
Both are excellent synths, each with their own values. Tom's explanation
matches my own experience and opinions exactly.

Mike.

"The NDA is another weapon the fat cat uses to keep the secrets
so he can continue to eat strawberries from a young orifice."
- The legendary infallible Muzikin - 06/00

_________________________________===========___............................
| FAT BOY |PERSONAL: .................
|Harley ======================================|mikekent@... ....
| oo|-.||o||-|-|oo--oooo.|.||-|-|||.||||.||||.|HOME PAGE: ................
|---------------------------------------------|members.xoom.com/eviguy/ ...
| o oooo oooo ooo oo [8888] oooooooo oooooooo |............................
|...xx o ___________________________________ |BUSINESS ..................
|||| == |UU|UUU|UU|UUU|UU|UUU|UU|UUU|UU|UUU|| |mikekent@... ...
|_______|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||_|............................


>> I know this has been bandied about. . . maybe too much. But this
question
>> is giving me an ulcer. I'm inbetween ordering an mks-80 or a jp8. I've
>> read the archive. . . and I'm not convinced that people liking one over
>> the other are fully informed. This makes sense. . . what person in their
>> right mind own both at the same time? But that's what I'm hoping for:
>> somebody who knows both synths very well. I have questions about
envelope
>
> Well, at the height of my gear addiction/excess I had 5 JP-8's
> and 3 MKS-80's w. programmers. The low point of Jupiters was
> 2 JP-8's and 0 MKS-80's. Current is 3 and 2. Probable near
> future is 3 and 1.
>
> Here's a couple random comments first - (note that all
> comments assume the MPG-80 w. the MKS-80. If not, it's
> no contest. A PC-1600 is a pain to use compared to the MPG-80).
>
> I could be a happy guy with a Jupiter-8 and a MiniMoog.
>
> Whenever I have to sell something big to raise cash, the MKS-80 w.
> MPG-80 is usually the first thing to go.
>
> Even though the MKS-80 sounds great I reach for a lot of others
> synths first.
>
> If you have a reasonable amount of gear, the MKS-80 isn't really
> essential. I think the JP-8 is essential.
>
> Part of the issue is interfacing. It's easy to power up the JP-8,
> grab some notes, hit HOLD, 2 octave random arpeggiation, and then
> edit the front panel to your heart's content while periodically
> wiggling the bender. :-)
>
> I'd rather spend an extra $300 (actually 285) and add an Encore MIDI
> kit if I felt I really needed MIDI on the JP-8.
>
> I haven't set up the MKS-80/MPG-80 on top of a dedicated keyboard
> and tried to use it like a regular synth. That may change the
> frequency of useage, but we'll see.
>
> If you don't need the arpeggiator and keyboard, or if space is a
> consideration and you really need MIDI, the MKS-80 w. programmer is
> the better bet.
>
>
>> speed, midi-lag, "warmth", "fizziness," "fuzziness," "buzziness,"
>> "bloopabiity," distortion, bass repsonse, midrange, etc. Maybe a
>> comparison of "standard" sounds: ie, square wave bass, pulsewidth lead,
>> sawtooth bass, string sounds, etc.
>>
> JP-8 is warmer than the MKS-80
> JP-8 can be fuzzier than the MKS-80
>
> MKS-80 can be fizzier than the JP-8
> MKS-80 can be buzzier than the JP-8
>
> The MKS-80 sounds more 'modern' than the JP-8. The JP-8 is like
> drinking a brandy in a smoking jacket. The MKS-80 is like drinking
> a martini in a suit.
>
> The JP-8 is an instrument whereas the MKS-80 is a sound module.
>
> --
>
> ___________________________________________________________
> Tom Moravansky tmoravan@...
>