--- In AN1x-list@y..., "Peter Korsten" <peterk@i...> wrote:
> From: "Gary Gregson" <gary@y...>
>
> > For low latency audio Win2K and XP perform really well.
>
I'd visited a local music store this past Monday and the salesperson
took it upon himself to inform me how poorly XP performs with MIDI and
Audio apps?!? Since I've no first hand experience in this area I'm
inclined to take Gary's experiences more seriously and this should go
to show how ∗silly∗ this topic can become :-P
I don't doubt that we're all capable of respecting each others
intelligence to determine the platform which suits our individual
requirements (and budget!)
> Speaking of which, Mac OS X has the lowest audio latency of them all. Linux
> with some fancy (and experimental) software does a little better with no
> system load, but Mac OS X keeps the same latency under high load, whereas
> the others all get higher latencies.
I'm VERY excited about MIDI and Audio under Mac OS X. So much so that
I've started scheming, uh, I meant 'budgeting', yeah that's it -
'budgeting' ;-) for a new G4 to replace my G3 with its sloooow 66 Mhz
system bus. Damn, even a 400 Mhz iMac has 100 Mhz system bus!!! :-#
>
> Software and drivers also seem to be coming to OS X, so this will be
> interesting to look at in due time.
TC Works
http://www.tcworks.de/ has announced a freeware audio editor -
Spark ME - that was to be made available as of today. Very, very cool
IMO.
>
> I have a PC at the moment, but the thing that attracts me about OS X is its
> Unix based kernel.
>
> - Peter
regards,
Jon
p.s. - two demerits to Reggie for starting this thread ;-)
p.p.s. - two more demerits for anybody who ignored his plea to respond
∗offline∗ ;-)
p.p.s.s. - let's move on to another subject now...