From: "Sayer" <
sayerseely@...>
> Congratulations!!! What a Christmas! Are you going to keep it, or sell it
and
> buy a whole bunch of synths and create a retirement account? :-)
I thought about to trade it for a Brazilian car (this one is import), but I
won't do that, and sell my Renault to buy some gear. On the other hand I'm a
good son, so I'll give the Renault to my father to help him to buy his Grand
Cherokee (or something like that).
> > > > Waldorf Micro Q?
> > Does it realy match the Q sound or is it like the Virus rack?
>
> They are supposed to closely match the Q sound. You can even load Q sounds
into
> the Micro Q. A small conversion is done to weed out the non-supported
> parameters.
That's nice...
> There are some differences. No step sequencer, digital out, or cross
modulation
> on the Micro Q. The Micro Q is capable of more voices (25) than the
regular Q
> (16). Waldorf has changed the architecture a bit so that the Micro Q uses
the
> DSP power more intelligently. Instead of holding the same amount of power
aside
> for each voice it dynamically allocates the resources so that the more
complex
> the voice (# oscillators, # effects, etc.) the more DSP power is used.
The Waldorf gear sounds better then the Access ones, but it the virus have
some spects that make it "affordable" and the Waldorf synths doesn't match.
Some days ago I changed my mind and started to take a closer look at the
MicroWave XT (30 voices) then I knew the Micro Q. Now I don't know what to
do (again..:-).
> I have been really trying to decide between the Micro Q and the Q rack,
but
> have finally decided on the Mico Q. In the future the Micro Q will be
> upgradeable to a max of 75 voices.
I knew that...you'll never run out of voices again, at least I believe that
you don't have six arms..:-)
> I have just ordered a Virus b also. :-)
Are you dealing w/ drugs or just sold your mom to get the money???...:-)))
Cheers,
PinheadX.