Archive of the former Yahoo!Groups mailing list: The Yamaha AN1x Synthesizer mailing list

previous by date index next by date
previous in topic topic list  

Subject: Re: [AN1x] Re: DK 600

From: Jeff <jf.serviere@...>
Date: 2007-11-28

Hello !
have you tried sucessfully to download the repair manual of the DK 600?
This been said i completely agree with you. But some were totally
unreliable...IMO due to random manufacturing problems, and a "light"
quality control, not because of a poor design...
The battery leaks were common on Korg Poly 6 too, most of those that you
can find now have been repaired, or will die from this disease sooner or
later. Put this f.. battery anywhere in the case, but not on a PCB !
We've had the same issues at work with backup batteries for CMOS static
RAMs.
Cheers
J.F.

NovemberPapa a écrit :

>Hi,
>
>
>
>Well until the dreaded battery leak problem hit, my DK600 had been totally
>reliable - never needed repairs. I gigged it extensively too, so it had to
>put up with all sorts of dodgy power points in local venues. It always spot
>on.
>
>
>
>And IMO all the comments about quality of sound are correct- it really
>is/was one of the best sounding of its era, particularly for any sounds
>using its pulse width modulation features. And what many people don't
>realise, and I think contributed a lot to make that sound just a little
>better, was that it had 3 LFOs per voice instead of 2 like most synths
>have/had. LFO's 1 and 2 were each assigned to one of the oscillators, and
>you could get interesting effects by the fact that each oscillator had its
>own LFO. You could choose only to have LFO 1 active or LFO 2, or both.
>These LFOs were used to affect the oscillator pitch, so you could easily get
>nice thick sounds by have LFO operated detuning of only one of the 2
>oscillators, much better than a fixed detuning of 1 oscillator against
>another.
>
>
>
>LFO 3 was used to affect filter cutoff, or pulse width modulation amount,
>and with the latter, you had the flexibility to affect only one or both
>oscillators, again giving a better sense of movement within the overall
>sound.
>
>
>
>I'm still hoping to get it going again!
>
>
>
>Nigel
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>