[sdiy] Buchla's funky 4 pole
mark verbos
mverbos at earthlink.net
Sun Sep 24 02:47:14 CEST 2006
Hi,
I recently had the opportunity to work with a Buchla 191 Sharp Cuttoff
filter. This is a 4 pole lopass and Hipass in one module, with
facilities to run the two as separate filters or as one bandpass. The
Hipass section in particular sounds great, however I was not able to get
it to self oscillate, even with TONS of external feedback. My guess is
that it is a matching issue, but that is only semi-related to my question.
This configuration is unlike any other filter I've seen before. It is
totally discrete, each of four cascaded integrator stages is made up of
an NPN pair acting like diodes for the voltage control and 2 gain
stages, the first a FET/NPN follower and the second a discrete OP AMP
made from an NPN pair and a PNP (quite common in the Buchla 100).
I've drawn up one stage to check out here.
http://www.simple-answer.com/191/Buchla-191-lopass-stage.jpg
the functional block diagram is here.
http://www.simple-answer.com/191/191-lopass-equiv.gif
the control ports (the top and bottom of the "diodes") are driven by
differential voltages.
I'm thinking of cloning this thing, but I'm wondering if it is necessary
to have all those trim pots. Particularly the ones to trim the
transistor pair connected as diodes. I mean, that pot runs thru a 22M
resistor! Were transistors MUCH more unmatched within a matched NPN pair
in the 60s, so much that they would no longer need trimming these days?
It is a TD101, which I have never heard of and can't find any info on.
Should I try it with plain ol' diodes? Did anyone else use diodes like
this? I know the Steiner filter uses diodes, but it's quite different.
Also, the Korg MS-50, but that's a diode ring.
I think this thing is cool. but just because I have never seen something
before, does not mean that it is innovative. However, I figured you guys
would get a kick out of seeing this.
Mark
More information about the Synth-diy
mailing list