[sdiy] string machine technology?
David Moylan
dave at westphila.net
Fri Nov 3 16:43:52 CET 2006
The Paia Strings n' Things approach was to use digital gates to provide
a narrow pulse waveform to approximate the spectral content of a bowed
string. Can't remember where I read that description. I think they may
have used 12.5% pulses. Probably more efficient than using an
individual filter per note as the Omni did. I think it's just a simple
RC high pass per note.
Dave
Antti Pitkämäki wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is an interesting topic!
>
> richard at skydancer.com wrote:
>
>> Aside from the chorus, the only thing that makes a string synth
>> different to an organ is some high pass filtering and soft attack.
>
> What about the waveforms? I had an Arp Omni 2 and I remember it had a
> swith for "hollow waveform on/off", which sounded like that it switched
> between a sawtooth and a squarewave. Does anybody have experience with
> any other string machines?
>
> I know binary dividers create squarewaves, but you can "stack" a few
> octaves together at certain volumes to get a staired sawtooth waveform.
>
> Farfisa Compact organs seem to use some sorta hard synced oscillators
> (there's a word for it... "relaxation oscillator"?? or somehing...
> "blocking osc"? cant't remember...) as "dividers" to create pulse waves
> that have a sawtooth shape on the narrower part.
>
> (neon lamp organs create sawtooths with their "dividers" but that
> technology isn't used on string machines I guess)
>
> What ways are there to get sawtooth waveforms on string machines?
>
> Antti
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today it's FREE!
> http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/
>
More information about the Synth-diy
mailing list