[sdiy] jitter in oscillators for music purposes

Scott Gravenhorst music.maker at gte.net
Mon Jul 19 15:44:17 CEST 2004


"Paul Maddox" <P.Maddox at signal.qinetiq.com> wrote:
>Scott/Martin,
>
>  I have to agree with martin, Yes the Chameleon can do it, but its a lot
>quicker to develop the basic 'structure' on a PC.
>Once you're happy you've proven your theory, then go into 56K assembly and
>Chameleon.

Paul, 

Is there a preferred platfrom for such PC development?  (I mean PC, not
Mac).  And what is your favorite?  (ahem) Cost of this?


>
>
>
>> >This is getting interesting.  Is the Chameleon capable of this sort of
>thing
>> >(spoke by a person who would love to get one when money finally becomes
>> >something I can count)?
>>
>> Yes, but it's a _far_ better idea to prototype algorithms on a
>> platform with floating point and fast compile cycle i.e. a PC or Mac.
>> Once the algorithm is in shape then it's time to think about a fixed
>> point implementation and optimizing the parallel instructions needed
>> to get performance from a 56k.
>>
>>
>> Martin
>>
>> | VAZ virtual analogue synths | www.monosect.com
>> | www.software-technology.com | electronoiseclash
>>
>>
>

---------------------------------------------------------
- Where merit is not rewarded, excellence fades.
- Hydrogen is pointless without solar.
- What good are laws that only lawyers understand?
- The media's credibility should always be questioned.
- The only good terrorist is a dead terrorist.
- Governments do nothing well, save collect taxes.

-- Scott Gravenhorst | LegoManiac / Lego Trains / RIS 1.5
-- Linux Rex         | RedWebMail by RedStarWare
-- FatMan: home1.gte.net/res0658s/FatMan/
-- NonFatMan: home1.gte.net/res0658s/electronics/
-- Autodidactic Master of Arcane and Hidden Knowledge.



More information about the Synth-diy mailing list