[sdiy] Possible New Waveform Generator Circuits
rdrake
rdrake at data2action.com
Tue Apr 6 15:24:50 CEST 2004
I think the original question was something like "can anyone help me with this circuit idea?"... and it sounds like the answer, from this list anyway, is "no". no need to go any further than that.
simon--the ascii "schematic" is not clear to me, nor apparently to others... although i'm sure it's clear to you. a good next step might be to present your drawing to the group in a format we can understand. typically, we put schematics on the web as gif, jpeg, or pdf files and refer to the url in a post to the list. if you don't have access to a web site, i'd be happy to post it for you. just a suggestion.
bests
lbd
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Simon Gatrall" <gatrall at pacbell.net>
>> To: <synth-diy at dropmix.xs4all.nl>
>> Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2004 4:35 AM
>> Subject: Re: [sdiy] Possible New Waveform
>Generator Circuits
>>
>>
>>> For the benefit of fellow SDIY'ers let me
>summarize:
>>>
>>>> furthermore there were several psychopaths on
>the list that strongly
>>>> libeled me because I did not fulfill nitpicking
>requests
>>>
>>> I read your post on AH and like many other
>people there I have a
>>> pretty good familiarity with various synthesis
>methods and the
>>> history of electronic music. I also have a
>company which makes
>>> electronic music equipment. In other words, I
>should be able to at
>>> least follow your preamble, even if I can't
>follow your awkward ASCII
>>> schematics. However, the following paragraph
>makes little sense to
>>> me, and evidently, many other people with far
>more years of
>>> electronics experience than mine:
>>>
>>>> There is a way to drastically alter a waveform
>in a
>>>> very simple fashion in such a way that the
>waveform
>>>> remains nearly as smooth as a sine wave. That
>method of
>>>> alteration is to successively increase, or
>successively
>>>> decrease, the size of a wave from the beginning
>of the
>>>> waveform to it's end, thus resulting in an
>outward
>>>> spiraling waveform or an inward spiraling
>waveform,
>>>> respectively. These modifications are made to
>each of the 2
>>>> arcs of the sine wave cycle. I have asked about
>such
>>>> waveforms on multiple mailing lists, and no one
>is
>>>> familiar with them. I am surprised that such
>waveforms are
>>>> not already common, considering how basic they
>are.
>>>
>>> If you can provide some sort of explanation of
>what that gobbledegook
>>> is supposed to mean, perhaps by posting some
>diagrams on the net
>>> somewhere, maybe people will be willing to help
>you, but if all you
>>> can do is get mad at other people when you are
>the one that seems to
>>> have trouble communicating, well... of course
>they're going to get
>>> irritated.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Herbalife Independent Distributor
>www.healthiest.co.za
>>>
>>> I didn't notice this sig the first time around,
>but it certainly
>>> detracts from any credibility this guy is trying
>to court here.
>>>
>>> Herbalife is a massive scam:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Simon Gatrall
>>> gatrall at pacbell.net
>>>
>>
>___________________________________________________
>____
>http://cockeyed.com/workfromhome/workfromhome_s.htm
>l
More information about the Synth-diy
mailing list