[sdiy] (OT) VOCALOID vocal synthesis

Rude 66 r.lekx at chello.nl
Mon Nov 24 22:14:00 CET 2003


> > And for some music styles it will be a true blessing, as the producers
> > can now select the bimbo(m/f) only on its looks. A faint shade of
> > singing talent (and a autotune plugin) will no longer be needed.
>

i'd love to. i enjoy using weird speech stuff in my tracks. for me and many
other producers, the vocal is just another part of the song. the song is not
there to support the vocal, like in most 'normal' songs. i'd use it if only
to get rid of the arguments with singers after i've mangled their voice..;-)

> That also was my first thought. The way they already got rid of the
> musicians by replacing them with "producers" and "performers", they now
> can even strip down their requirements for the latter group.
>

oh, come on now. did the synthesizer replace piano players? are there less
drummers since the coming of the linn drum? no.

> The first one will then concentrate on re-working old stuff, now that they
> even can synthesize the vocal lines and don't have to restrict themselves
> to rearranging material sampled from old studio tapes -- follwing the
> motto "It was a hit back then, as cover versions in the 80s and 90s, it
> will work now as well."

not all producers are like that. it's the bedroom producer where musical
innovation comes from these days..and for a ig part thanks to them the
interest in analogue and even diy is back again.


> In the end, it's then the "music pirates" who bring CD sales even more
> down calling for even more restrictive laws...


i sense a negative vibe here..;-)

there's more music being released these days than ever. the indie labels are
doing fine. it's the majors that are suffering, and for a good reason:
releasing shit for inflated prices. of course it's more subtle than that,
but don't believe all the 'let's blame the kazaa users and cd copiers' hype.

r./













More information about the Synth-diy mailing list