[sdiy] Black Magic oscillator cans
Theo
t.hogers at home.nl
Mon Jul 21 19:27:14 CEST 2003
Oeps, didn't see this one
Yes the 2.00024MHz seems to make some sence then.
Theo
From: Tim Ressel <madhun2001 at yahoo.com>
> Ingo,
>
> I ran the numbers on my trusty MICROSOFT spreadsheet
> and got the following maximum errors:
>
> 2.00024MHz: +0.069%, -0.0689%
> 2.00000MHz: +0.057%, -0.0809%
>
> Of course the relative note-to-note errors stay the
> same...
>
> --tr
>
> --- Ingo Debus <debus at cityweb.de> wrote:
> > Tim Ressel wrote:
> > >>BTW, I can't figure out
> > >>how you derived 2,00024 MHz.
> > >
> > >
> > > Ask Mostek. That is the frequency for the MK50240
> > TOG
> > > to make A=440. Its probably from a set of divisors
> > > they came up with to meet a certain error spec,
> > and
> > > that's the frequency that works with those
> > divisors.
> > >
> > > By the by: 50240 divisors:
> > > C 478
> > > C# 451
> > > D 426
> > > D# 402
> > > E 379
> > > F 358
> > > F# 338
> > > G 319
> > > G# 301
> > > A 284
> > > A# 268
> > > B 253
> > > C' 239
> >
> > The frequency error introduced by these divisors is
> > way way bigger
> > than that caused by using a 2 MHz clock instead of
> > 2.00024 MHz.
> >
> > Am I the only one who noticed this? Or did I miss
> > the point completely?
> >
> > Ingo
> >
> >
>
>
> __________________________________
> Do you Yahoo!?
> SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
> http://sbc.yahoo.com
More information about the Synth-diy
mailing list