[sdiy] Control Interfaces (was Wakeman)
ASSI
Stromeko at compuserve.de
Tue Jul 8 22:21:42 CEST 2003
On Tuesday 08 July 2003 19:54, Rainer Buchty wrote:
[...]
> whereas the piano player is more or less done with modulation after
> the key is stroked; maybe some fiddling with the damper/sustain
> pedal.
Not all keyboard instruments work like that. Harpsichords and Cembalos
are examples of historical instruments that let you control the tone
after the key has been struck. The grand piano features some very
intricate possibilities concerning the letting go of the key
(repetition) and control over the tone with the shift pedal (it is a
soft pedal only on uprights). How effective the sustain pedal is can
easily be demonstarted when playing a piece requiring it's use (musical
requirement, not for playing more notes than you have fingers) without
it. Synthesizers usually have at least monophonic aftertouch. Wind
organs can be played (sort of) with polyphonic aftertouch, and they
also have volume pedals.
> So maybe the overall question is: what would a "keyboard" (for the
> lack of any better word...) would look like which allows you playing
> any kind of chords (-> polyphonic play) but gives you a similar
> amount of expression/modulation controls as e.g. string or wind
> instruments while still being playable at similar ease of the piano
> keyboard?
I seem to remember that some folks (at some university in Canada?) were
trying to implement keys that sense where the fingers are at any given
time plus you supposedly were able to "waggle" on the key from side to
side as well. I'm almost certain I had a weblink, but even if I find
it, it would be 10 years old...
Achim.
-- +<[ Q+ & Matrix-12 & WAVE#46 & microQkb Omega sonic heaven ]>+ --
Factory and User Sound Singles for Waldorf Q, microQ and rackAttack:
http://homepages.compuserve.de/Stromeko#WaldorfSounds
More information about the Synth-diy
mailing list