[sdiy] Help-Blacet midi-din sync chip problems!

[Rob B]

Er, actually, I was looking to somewhat
modify Colins software to do per step
offsets and shift the timing signals
around in groups of 6..

Don't know how the x0x stuff would take
to it though. ;)

Rob

----- Original Message -----
From: "David D" <shockadd at hotmail.com>
To: <cyborgzero at home.com>
Cc: <synth-diy at dropmix.xs4all.nl>
Sent: Sunday, February 10, 2002 8:33 PM
Subject: Re: [sdiy] Help-Blacet midi-din
sync chip problems!


>
>
>
> >From: "Rob B" <cyborgzero at home.com>
> >To: "Colin Fraser"
<colin at colinfraser.com>, "'David D'"
> ><shockadd at hotmail.com>,
<synth-diy at dropmix.xs4all.nl>
> >Subject: Re: [sdiy] Help-Blacet
midi-din sync chip problems!
> >Date: Sun, 10 Feb 2002 12:52:16 -0500
> >
> >Problem is, this 50% duty cycles
screws
> >*some* 808s and 606s up pretty badly,
> >and they begin to slip.
>
>   Thats weird cause my 606,808 and CR
8000 all output a nice 50% duty
> pulse and sync to each other perfectly
with each others sync output.
>
> >
> >I propose a scheme by which the duty
> >cycle can be set somehow. The 808s
and
> >606s tend to work better on about a
30%
> >duty cycle. I used a pwm circuit to
get
> >the Xbase to sync a 606 properly,
funny
> >thing is that it synced a 202 and a
303
> >just fine with the 50% duty cycle of
the
> >Xbase.
>
>   That would be awesome as you could
do some crazy stuff with timing etc if
> you had totally controllable sync unit
like that!  Aahh to dream...
>
>   DavidD
>
>
________________________________________
_________________________
> Chat with friends online, try MSN
Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com
>