I’m using the MIS version of 2200 cart that has a sponge in half of it - never had that problem. Maybe I’m just lucky. Paul www.PaulRoark.com <http://www.paulroark.com/> _____ From: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com [mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Steve Kale Sent: Sunday, November 26, 2006 2:44 PM To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Comparing prints for that "3 dimensional quality"? I have found that they eventually leak all the ink into the printer (2100). From: Paul Roark <paul.roark@verizon. <mailto:paul.roark%40verizon.net> net> Reply-To: <DigitalBlackandWhit <mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint%40yahoogroups.com> eThePrint@yahoogroups.com> Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2006 14:05:54 -0800 To: <DigitalBlackandWhit <mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint%40yahoogroups. com> eThePrint@yahoogroups.com> Subject: RE: [Digital BW] Comparing prints for that "3 dimensional quality"? Steve, >... I still feel there are big issues with small format > (A3 and below) cartridges. It¹d be nice to see some investment here. I've had good luck with all but the 1280 carts. With those, I think it depends on whether the particular cart is well aligned to the printer involved, but it's been a while since I had a 1280. My suspicions were, the last time I had one of those, that air was leaking in due to a poor seal between the cart and printer. That, of course, makes for perpetually bad nozzle checks. Have you had bad luck with the 2200 and 2400 style carts? Paul www.PaulRoark.com [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
RE: [Digital BW] Comparing prints for that "3 dimensional quality"?
2006-11-26 by Paul Roark
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.