I was using the curves supplied with QTR, the ones made > by Jon's studio, so the it shouldn't have been my incompetence in making curves that > caused the problems. ------------------------- That was very interesting Mark and I appreciate the feed back. I haven't talked to anyone doing exactly this, though I know a lot of people must be. It isn't a problem with your incompetence because you sound experienced. I believe the problem is the variation in the older printers. The supplied curves with the 7000 were ok, but not great for me. Everything was a bit flat with them. I was just about to set it up with Studio Print too. However, I talked to Roy and then my 7000 was linearized using icc create and custom curves for MY machine and a few papers. When I did this it was a totally different output. This should be done with any printers but these 7000's just vary so much that this is totally mandatory. I belive Jon found that out with the 1280's too which is why they started that IQuad thing making people custom curves. Surely you are making custom linearizations and reading all the patches with Studio Print? If so that is what the difference is I'm sure. The newer printers like the 2200 and the 9600 are very close but not perfect. They should be custom linearized too. The 10K's are very different from unit to unit. It's funny though. Some people have better luck with different rips on different machines. Bill Kennedy started working with K7 on a 2200 early on and he said he had much better results with the Bauhaus rip. Whatever works is is whatever works I guess. John
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Comparing prints for that "3 dimensional quality"?
2006-11-26 by john dean
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.