John, Tyler, I get your point. But a question: not having a large format printer myself, I understand that changing cartridges is not something you want to do on a regular basis (I don't care on my desktop 2100). That means you have to choose between a K7 set in a certain tone (warm, neutral whatsoever) or a mixed K3 or K4 set(e.g. K, warm LK, LLK and LLLK, cool LK, LLK and LLLK) to allow for different tones per image or variable split tone curves. That's what I have with UT3D set + QTR. Given that choice: what would you choose and why? Another, perhaps related, question: isn't there a big difference between the variable size dot 7600 and the older fixed size dot models? Combining the two points above, the better choice would seem the me a dual tone K3/K4 set with variable dot printer like the 7600. Am I correct? Joost --- In DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com, "john dean" <deanwork2003@...> wrote: > > Tyler, > > I've been suggesting just that here for the last few months. It's a no > brainer and Roy did a wonderful job with QTR support. When I see all > these people fighting color casts of this and that and all the other > clogging and related issues I just cringe, because this K6/K7 method > is so easy and so trouble free and so smooth and beautiful. So much so > that I've got three old 7000 for them, one of which I got for free > that is like new. And, they are about to have the pressurized carts > filled for my 10K so that will give me an even larger size with real > speed and an extra printer for split toning. Of course you can always > buy the ink in bulk too and fill your own MIS or Lyson or Media Street > refillable carts. > > John > > > > K6/7s, > > you can get a used 7000, 7600, or 4000 for very reasonable prices, QTR > > for 50$, the inkset and be up and going with extraordinary high > > quality and good print size for far less money and no hassle... > > This of course, after deciding you want that kind of setup. > > I had the chance to get a used 7600 for $500 and passed it up, stupid... > > Tyler. >
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Comparing prints for that "3 dimensional quality"?
2006-11-25 by Joost Horsten
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.