Digital BW, The Print

On Nov 16, 2006, at 10:18 PM, Paul Roark wrote:
 >The
 >point is really to avoid papers like EEM that are acidic due to  
them not
 >being pure cellulose.

Makes you wonder how Wilhelm/Epson come up with 75 years for EEM.


 >I would rather
 >have pure cotton there but at $0.30 per sq. ft. v. $1.66 per sq.  
ft. for
 >cotton that prints as well, I'm just not willing to pay that  
difference.

Have you found that you can proof on the Matte BW and then get  
exactly the same results on cotton for your final prints?

Clark

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]