Depending on your goals and methods, the readings _before_ linearization from so many steps can be helpful to determine if your measured curve is smooth enough for the linearization to work, i.e. the humps and dips are not very large or abrupt. Using measure tool with my eye-1 in strip scan mode, the noise is low enough to resolve 1024 gray patch steps; rather surprising in itself. That said, I dont believe you need large numbers of patches for QTR to linearize well. I believe Roy is pleased with the 21 patch x 4 reading approach. Best regards, John Moody -----Original Message----- From: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com [mailto:DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com]On Behalf Of horstenj Sent: Wednesday, September 20, 2006 12:38 PM To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [Digital BW] 256 Gray Random Target for QTR Actually 256 steps might not even work. You'll definitely get some noise/random errors in the measurements that might very well be larger then the differences in the steps. The QTR linearization algorithm expects a monotone series of numbers. Even if the steps are not large enough the algoritm can complain, as a experienced recently. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
RE: [Digital BW] 256 Gray Random Target for QTR
2006-09-20 by John Moody
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.