"I have read so many posts in this group regarding the difficulty of achieving a satisfactory b&w print with injet technology" Yeah, like it's so easy with traditional darkroom. Until inkjet I rarely saw any good B&W prints from anyone but the pros. Sad thing was I saw many who thought they were good with the traditional darkroom who were awful. Richard On 8/20/05, T <griller1_99@...> wrote: > > I have to agree with John Sexton's comments having spent many years > photographing and realizing the results of my efforts in the darkroom. The > results I have achieved with injet are not as rewarding to me. I have read > so many posts in this group regarding the difficulty of achieving a > satisfactory b&w print with injet technology. Some of the recent posts > referring to John's comment understand him and others just don't get it!! > While it is true the major manufacturers are getting into the newer > techonology and putting the "old" aside unfortunately. There is sitll a > glimmer of light because there are others coming along to take their place. > Therefore those of us who find more satisfaction doing our photography the > "old-fashioned" way can take heart that we will be able to continue. If your > choice is digital, more power to you! I am not ready at this juncture to > join the "more pixels" race. My old MF camera continues to "chug" along > giving me beautiful transparencies and > negatives. And I don't have the "I'll fix it in photoshop" mentality yet!! > ..:-) > > T > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: John Sexton's comment on B&W print
2005-08-21 by Richard Sintchak
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.