THAT is the most inane statement made lately. Maybe just to start an argument?? Upgrades DO provide usefullness and functionality. Access to more and better memory, hard drives, devices (USB 2.0). I suppose one could just print BO with a dot-matrix printer and say, "That's good enough." (Hey, that might be a good gimic!! Peter Maxx move over!!) ==> "Anthony G. Atkielski" wrote: ==>> since every upgrade ==>> destabilizes a machine and risks bringing it down for ==hours or days, ==>> and virtually no upgrades provide any useful or required new ==>> functionality. ==> AND, C'mon! Let's not start the MAC/PC stuff. I have worked for both IBM and Apple. They both have problems! I have gone nuts on my PC stuff. When I was at the Pentagon last year we had two high-end MAC systems go bonkers. After THREE installs and seven hours, a tech support guy said, "Oh, there's a fix for that," and gave us the double-secret location to download it. It happens on everything. ==> ==> Can I have a couple of hits of what you're smoking? == ==I think it is called Windoze. Seth
Message
RE: [Digital BW] Re: I don't know a justification for CS in real photography
2005-03-08 by Seth
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.