You make a valid point - that inks and papers have to be considered together. This is clearly true, and Wilhelm's results show this. But to say that we have to use Epson's inks and papers just because we are using an Epson printer is, well, absurd. I don't use GM brand gas, oil, or tires on my GM truck either. This is especially true since Epson eschews the B&W market. Many of us here find that Epson's inks make unacceptable B&W prints. Many of us find that Epson's (rebranded) papers are likewise unacceptable. And if you think I'm using Hahnemuhle Photo Rag because it's cheaper, you need to do some more research. Over time, the various manufacturers will learn to make more robust products, or the market will backlash on them. Epson is a prime example - the backlash against the ghastly fading and orange shifting of the 1270 dye inks a few years ago begat the pigment ink onslaught which eventually resulted in the UltraChromes, which aren't half bad, for color inks. Without third party competition for the consumables market, we wouldn't be having this conversation. Without Media Street, MIS, Cone, Lyson, Hawk Mtn., Hahnemuhle, Futures, and many, many other companies, innovation would drop to a crawl, and users like me would have thrown their 1270s in the trash and returned to the darkroom. Blaming the users is not the answer. Competing manufacturers (third party or OEM) making better products, bringing them to market, and competing for market share is. -- Hogarth Hughes Bob Frost wrote: >Peter, > >In my brief experience, 99% of the mysterious problems with inkjet prints >are due to people using 3rd-party inks and papers. Printer manufacturers go >to a lot of trouble to get matching papers and inks that work with their >printers most of the time. Then along comes Joe Bloggs who thinks he knows >better and can save a dollar/euro/pound or two by using WonderGlo ink and >Cheapo paper. > >The Wilhelm institute papers show how important it is to get the right match >of ink and paper if you want longevity. > >Bob Frost. > > > >
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Re: Toxic yellow photorag!
2004-10-27 by Hogarth Hughes
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.