Yahoo Groups archive

Digital BW, The Print

Index last updated: 2026-04-28 22:56 UTC

Message

Re: [Digital BW] Sharpening vs. Print size [was: Image Density vs. Print Size]

2004-04-13 by Steve Kale

Ah hullo? No I don¹t.  I scan with an Imacon 848.  A great scan still
requires sharpening (as discussed earlier in this thread).  The question is:
what is the most intelligent means of sharpening and which tools have been
developed to make intelligent scanning easier and more efficient?


From: "photographyworks" <photographyworks@...>
Reply-To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2004 19:35:43 -0000
To: DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Digital BW] Sharpening vs. Print size [was: Image Density vs.
Print Size]

If you have a great greyscale scan, sharpen with PS, if it isn´t a
great greyscale scan, throw it away therefor you do not have to
sharpen it. Look at Unwerth´s photographs! She never knows anything
about photography, but what crazy prints!!!
You know what I mean?
Bernard from Austria





[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]

Attachments

Move to quarantaine

This moves the raw source file on disk only. The archive index is not changed automatically, so you still need to run a manual refresh afterward.