The question is a fairly simple one and relates to the physics of the situtation. It is - "is all the energy of the visible spectrum reflected off a scene contained in three discrete colors (Red, Green and Blue)?" If the answer is yes then one can reproduce any image with three discrete channels - red, green and blue. If there is energy that is attuniated but in the visible spectrum by only capturing three discrete frequency bands, then there are images that can not be produced. Another way to put it is can one generate a camalflodge where the appreance is significantly attenuated in a scene captured using three discrete frequency channels but is visible to an energy intensity filter? The answer to these questions will settle the technical argument. However, the argument aesthetics will probaobably go on forever. Truman Paul D. DeRocco wrote: > > From: cirkutguy [mailto:cirkut@...] > > > > I'm curious as to what information is missing from the color image > > that would be in the black and white. I too find that I often can't > > match the look of black and white film with a color conversion, but > > have always assumed that some amount of messing around would do it. > > A B&W image obviously doesn't contain more information than an RGB image, > but the color light coming in the front of the lens certainly contains > a lot > more information than what's finally represented on color film in RGB. If > you have a good assortment of filters, you can get spectral responses that > you can't get after the image has been reduced to RGB. > > However, there are also dramatic things that can be done on RGB > images, such > as subtracting the blue channel in order to make skies even darker, which > you can't possibly do once you've reduced the image to B&W. So in my view, > you get a wider range of effects from shooting color and converting to B&W > in PS, compared to shooting B&W with filters in front of the lens. > Also, the > convenience and opportunity for experimentation are self-evidently better > with post-processing. Finally, there's no law that says you can't put > filters over the lens, AND shoot color and convert to B&W afterwards, if > there's some magic spectral response that you can't get without the > filter. > > -- > > Ciao, Paul D. DeRocco > Paul mailto:pderocco@... > -- We imitate our masters only because we are not yet masters ourselves, and only because in doing so we learn the truth about what cannot be imitated. [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Message
Re: [Digital BW] On film
2004-04-11 by Truman Prevatt
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.