Hi Peter, Bruce is one of the crew behind of Photokit Sharpener (http://www.pixelgenius.com/) and it is a development of these ideas. We previously used the 2 pass workflow, and the new system adds automated and flexible versions of the familiar edge sharpening methods. Anthony's statement (1) might be true in some fantasy land with scanners which can resolve twice the maximum possible detail/grain frequency, but in the real world some careful capture sharpening can compensate for the inevitable shortcomings of the scanning process. Practical technology is so far from the theoretical ideal that achieving the right 'look' may be better than slavish adherence to the theory. Cheers, Colin http://www.travelling-light.com/ Peter Marquis-Kyle wrote: > Anthony G. Atkielski wrote: > >>Sharpening should always be the last step, for two reasons: (1) it >>degrades image quality; and (2) the degree of sharpening required >>depends on the exact use of the final image (printing or display, >>type >>of printer or press, reproduction size, dot gain, screen frequency, >>etc.). > > > In his piece 'A two-pass approach to sharpening in Photoshop' > [ http://www.creativepro.com/story/feature/12189-1.html ] > Bruce Fraser acknowledges that 'sharpening should always be the last > step' is the conventional wisdom, but has some other suggestions. > > Well worth reading... > > Peter Marquis-Kyle > www.marquis-kyle.com.au > > > > > Please visit the Group Homepage to check the Files, and other resources as they are often being updated. > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint > > If you wish to receive no emails or just a daily digest, or you wish to unsubscribe, please edit your Membership preferences by visiting this same page. > > Please follow these basic guidelines: > - As threads develop, trim off excess portions of earlier messages to keep them short. > - Good manners are required at all time. No personal attacks or flames. Hostile, aggressive or argumentative users may be removed from the membership without notice. > - Keep your posts and threads related to the group topic of digital B&W printing. Users who persistently make off-topic posts may be removed from the membership. > - By posting on this forum you agree to abide by the group rules and guidelines, and to abide by the actions and decisions of the group Owner and Moderators. See \ufffdGroup Topic, Rules and Guidelines\ufffd in the Files section: > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/DigitalBlackandWhiteThePrint/files/ > > BY PARTICIPATING IN AND/OR POSTING MESSAGES TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO! GROUP YOU EXPRESSLY UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE \ufffdOWNER\ufffd AND \ufffdMODERATORS\ufffd OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP SHALL NOT BE LIABLE TO YOU FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, CONSEQUENTIAL OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, DAMAGES FOR LOSS OF PROFITS, GOODWILL, USE, DATA OR OTHER INTANGIBLE LOSSES (EVEN IF THE \ufffdOWNER\ufffd AND \ufffdMODERATORS\ufffd OF DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP HAVE BEEN ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGES), RESULTING FROM: (i) THE USE OR THE INABILITY TO USE THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; (ii) UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO OR ALTERATION OF YOUR TRANSMISSIONS OR DATA; (iii) STATEMENTS OR CONDUCT OF ANY THIRD PARTY ON THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP; OR (iv) ANY OTHER MATTER RELATING TO THE DIGITAL BW, THE PRINT YAHOO GROUP. > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > >
Message
Re: [Digital BW] Scanners?
2004-02-19 by Colin & Linda McKie
Attachments
- No local attachments were found for this message.