this is correct. i just replaced the broken spring in my CS60 ribbon. In fact, I have been totally refurbishing the unit including fabricating parts for the aftertouch "bar", etc.
My hats off to the Japanese engineers that created this ingenious system.
pic1 - here is one half of the ribbon chamber with spring exposed.
http://www.timothyharold.com/images/synthstuff/cs60_ribbon1.jpgpic2 - here is the chamber closed with a graphic underneath depicting the orientation of the spring
http://www.timothyharold.com/images/synthstuff/cs60_ribbon1.jpgI hope to post a full description of my process complete with pics when completed. I'm about 90% done at present. Thanks to all on this group for contributing much of the info that has helped me.
- Tim
--- In yamahacs80@yahoogroups.com, jkjelec@... wrote:
>
>
>
> I think that the spring gets skewed to be sort of diagonal when it is p ushed down into its hol ding area in the plastic housing, and that is how it fits in the cha nnel that is smaller than its diameter.
>
>
>
> jkjelec
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>
>
> From: "papinje" <fernandozarone@...>
> To: yamahacs80@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2012 10:03:31 AM
> Subject: [yamahacs80] Ribbon controller question
>
> Inside the case of the CS60 / CS80 ribbon controller there is the conductive spring contacting the resistive strip when pushed down, am I right?
> My question is: I have seen the broken spring splitted in pieces, its diameter being constant (the separated pieces are retracted), while the internal room of the plastic case is reduced at the two ends. I cannot understand how the spring was fitted inside, when it was sound!
> The spring diameter cannot be "compressed" and reduced inside its "bed". Or is the splitter spring I see inside not original and too large?
> Any info? Is there any picture of a working spring in its place in the right position?
> Any help will be appreciated...
>
> Fernando
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>