>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Leslie Schwartz <mailto:lhs_emf@...>
> February 20, 2011 8:55 AM
>
>
>
> I agree that the recommendation is puzzling to me too. I would have
> expected
> that new polarized electrolytics would have been the type to use for a
> replacement of the tantalums.
>
> Good video though, and some more good info on CS-80 maintenance/repairs.
> Thanks.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: yamahacs80@yahoogroups.com [mailto:yamahacs80@yahoogroups.com] On
> Behalf Of Quazimodo
> Sent: Sunday, February 20, 2011 10:31 AM
> To: yamahacs80@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [yamahacs80] Re: My own CS-80
>
> I think the YouTube series of videos on saving the CS80 - by Gavin
> Curtis -
> shows those tantalum capacitors replaced with non-polarised polystyrene
> caps.... can that be right, replacing polarized with non-polarized?
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
I haven't seen the videos, but a couple of general capacitor notes.
First, pretty much no one has used tantalums in many years now. They
were a way to get a high value in a very small package. However, they
turned out to be really flaky, especially if ever connected backwards.
There are much better replacements now. Also, there's nothing wrong
with using a non-polarized cap to replace a polarized one. Again,
polarized (e.g. tantalums - which can blow up, electrolytics - which dry
out and fail over the years) caps were a way to get a higher value in a
smaller package if you knew the voltage only would go one way - like in
a power supply.
I'll have to look into the polystyrene caps more, but if they have the
same capacitance value, voltage rating, and they're small enough
physically, they're probably a much better choice. They shouldn't dry
out like electrolytics. Non-polarized means you don't have to worry
about putting it in backwards. And, I'm sure they better in other ways
- better tolerance, lower ESR, etc that could make them perform better
in some applications.
David
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]