Hi Stephen,
I tend to agree with you, but i have played a CS60 through a DC2 pedal a few
years ago and the sound was just incredible!! I hardly ever use the inbuilt
chorus on the CS80 because i dont like it, so for me its a ∗CONSIDERABLE∗
improvement, same with the tremolo circuit, the PH3 is a sweet sounding
phaser too!
Frees up my Dim D rack for another synth too :)
I want a DC2 inside my Xpander and Chroma too, in fact i think all synths
should have a built in dimension d... what were they thinking lol ;)
Midi is pretty essential for me. You know a lot of guys have Kenton midi on
their 80 and they say it works OK, Eric Persing for example...
Anyone have anything negative to say regarding implementing Kenton midi on
the CS80?
Agree about the reverb, i doesnt HAVE to be a Lexicon, ive just got this
thing for big old Lexicon units at the moment.. :)
Cheers,
Rob.
> Any modification of a CS80 that does not serve its stability is absolutely pointless in my view.
>
> Noisy chorus? Who cares? Noisy tremolo? Who cares? Don´t use it, simple as that. I find the built-in chorus slightly obtrusive anyway so I´d rather use the SDD-320 instead (some years ago I used to have an extra Dimension D just for the CS80), and it doesn´t have to be a Lexicon 224XL all the time. The Dynacord DRP20X sounds equally good ;-).
>
> I´d say integrating some Boss stomp boxes into a CS80 is like installing a Roots compressor or a 478cu Big Block V8 in a Rolls Royce Silver cloud... undoubtedly a cool feature but not quite up to its original character.
>
> Stephen (who even despises the idea of installing MIDI kits into a CS80).
>
> ____________________________________________________________________
>
> "Ambition makes you look pretty ugly, kicking squealing Gucci little piggy." (Thom Yorke/Radiohead -- "Paranoid Android")
>
> Finally available: Stephen Parsick -- Traces of the Past Redux, reissued with three previously unreleased bonus tracks.
>
> It´s out: [´ramp] & markus reuter -- "ceasing to exist", a gorgeous dark ambient album. available through our webshop at www.doombient.com
>
> For info and audio, please visit the official [´ramp] website at www.doombient.com
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Richard Atkinson
> To: yamahacs80@yahoogroups.com
> Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2007 11:51 AM
> Subject: Re: [yamahacs80] Re: the Mighty GX-1
>
>
> I really wish I had a CS-80 with the GX-1 filter.
>
> Actually I really wish I had a CS-80 or any kind of polyphonic Yamaha CS,
> but you get the general idea :)
>
> I think in terms of programming the CS-80 beats the GX-1 any day, but the
> GX-1 does have a warmer filter. That said, it shouldn't be too hard to
> modify the filter structure of the CS-80 for some different sounds (if
> anyone dares modify their CS!)
>
> Instead of using the HP and LP modes of the two filter chips per channel
> voice, both LP modes could be used instead. Depending on the spacing of the
> cutoff frequencies, you would have a region of 12dB cutoff slope and a
> region of 24dB, both with resonance peaks of course.
>
> Richard
>
> On 6/5/07, blchrr@... <blchrr@...> wrote:
> >
> > Its funny you know, i love the Cs80, but i just think the GX1 is too
> > much, i
> > dont find myself lusting after one at all, the programmer looks like a
> > nightmare too..
> > Id much rather have a PS3300, but its never going to happen at the sort of
> >
> > price they currently sell for... :)
> >
> > > Yeeeeeeee-OW!!!!
> > >
> > > If I could afford it, I would probably build a room (or small house)
> > > just for it,,, like a shrine or chappel for the worship of The
> > > Allmighty GX-1.....kinda' like the freaky mutants in the original
> > > Planet of the Apes movies worship that bomb (crap, I'm old enough to
> > > remember those cheesy flicks. Damn-you-to-Hell...!!! ;-P
> > >
> > > But back to reality.
> > > ∗sigh∗
> > >
> > > The next best thing is having my CS40m atop my CS80, I guess.
> > > Hell, they've both been holding their tunning quite well!
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>