Love it! Bravo!
If you do decide to mess about the Polysix's tuning please keep us updated
on your findings . . . with more graphs . . . and audio comparative
samples! :D
James
On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 10:41 AM, chipaudette <chipaudette@yahoo.com> wrote:
> ∗∗
>
>
> Hi All,
>
> I own both a Mono/Poly and Polysix. I had the Mono/Poly first and, given
> that the two synths are of the same vintage and share much of their circuit
> design, I got the Polysix assuming that it would be a poly synth that
> sounded very similar, which is what I wanted.
>
> When i got the Polysix, I found certain small (but important!) differences
> in sound. I've started to quantify the differences in the output of the two
> synths. If you're interested in frequency analyses and whatnot, you might
> choose to check out my figures and discussion...
>
>
> http://synthhacker.blogspot.com/2013/02/high-frequencies-polysix-vs-monopoly.html
>
> I'm definitely interested in any comments that you might have. The boost
> in treble frequencies relative to the ideal sawtooth is of particular
> interest to me. Any theories?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Chip
>
>
>
--
C'est La Guerre Moving Pictures Inc.
364 Home Street
Winnipeg, Manitoba
R3G 1X4
(204) 918 9317
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]