Archive of the former Yahoo!Groups mailing list: Discussion about the Korg PolySix synthesizer

previous by date index next by date
previous in topic topic list  

Subject: Re: [PolySix] Re: Cross for a 2SC2765?

From: Andrew Jury <andy@networkjabber.com>
Date: 2011-07-19

Hi Mike,

Q5 should be a 2SC945 so you could try our old friend the 2N2222!

Cheers,
Andy



On 19/07/2011 10:51, "Mike" <mborish_2000@yahoo.com> wrote:

>
>
>
>
>
> Q5 is where I got the transistor from. I'm pretty sure that it's a 2sc2785.
> If I remember correctly from studying power supplies, it is a current overload
> protection transistor; when the current on R2 gets high enough to create a
> 0.7 v drop across the BE junction of Q5, Q5 turns on and shuts down Q2.
>
> I'm going to give Q2 the good old diode test now that I think about it because
> it might also be faulty. Its been about six or seven months since I've been
> in this synth and I don't remember exactly what I did to it.
>
> On another note, I've also got a KLM-367 clone that I never got working.
> Obviously, I've got to get the 5 volt rail up first before I can find the
> problem in the KLM-367.
>
> Thanks,
> Mike
>
> --- In PolySix@yahoogroups.com <mailto:PolySix%40yahoogroups.com> , Andrew
> Jury <andy@...> wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi Mike,
>> >
>> > Which position in the PSU have you retrieved this transistor from?
>> >
>> > Cheers,
>> > Andy
>> >
>> >
>> > On 18/07/2011 22:45, "Mike" <mborish_2000@...> wrote:
>> >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > > It might be 2SC2785...
>>> > >
>>> > > --- In PolySix@yahoogroups.com <mailto:PolySix%40yahoogroups.com>
>>> <mailto:PolySix%40yahoogroups.com> , "Mike"
>>> > > <mborish_2000@> wrote:
>>>>> > >> >
>>>>> > >> > Has anybody crossed a 2SC2765 PolySix PSU transistor with a generic
2N∗
>>>> > >> American Version?
>>>>> > >> >
>>>>> > >> > I'm low on fuses and don't want to make a mistake or give this PSU
more
>>>> > >> time than it deserves.
>>>>> > >> >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>>> > >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>> >
>
>
>
>
>



[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]