| previous by date | index | next by date |
| previous in topic | topic list | next in topic |
On 03/09/2010 23:16, "ML" <f115@rocketmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> Oh ok - fair enough. I'm just trying to differentiate which parts are
> attempting to remain true to the original and if there's a technical reason
> why one might use a modern equivalent. Thanks again!
>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]