Archive of the former Yahoo!Groups mailing list: Discussion about the Korg PolySix synthesizer

previous by date index next by date
previous in topic topic list  

Subject: Re: [PolySix] using SSM2045 instead of SSM2044 ??

From: The Old Crow <oldcrow@oldcrows.net>
Date: 2005-05-19

I looked at the data sheet. It would require a daughtercard approach to
use the filter as the chips are not pin compatible. Other features (it is
similar to a CEM3372) would be turned off, too. Although, it has a final
VCA on it that has got to have better (less) CV feedthrough specs than the
Korg 1-Transistor Wonder. It could probably be used to replace the
SSM2044 and the VCA for each voice. It just needs a small PC board.

Regarding MS-20 filters, both the "Korg-35" (transistor SIP) and the
LM13600 (OTA) circuits are 2nd-order Sallen & Key models.

Crow
/∗∗/

On Thu, 19 May 2005, Johannes Hausensteiner wrote:

> From a quick view of the data sheets:
> They are kind of similar in that they contain both the VCF. But the 2045
> is 18pin / the 2044 is 16pin. The 2045 contains additionally two VCAs
> and a signal mixer. Furthermore it seems that the 2045 has 2pole input/
> output which gives nice different configurations, similar to an MS-20.
>
> Wasn't there a later version of the MS-20 which used an integrated
> filter as opposed to the "discrete" filter used on early models?
> The (discrete) filter of an MS-20 sounds absolutely stunning when
> modified for 4-pole operation.

> gil_we wrote:
> > Is there any way using the 2045 to replace a 2044 ?
> > Are they similar by any way ?
> >
> > Thanks