| previous by date | index | next by date |
| previous in topic | topic list | next in topic |
Hang around for a while John, and you will see plenty of nasty fights but we are a pretty thick skinned group
and always recover from our outbursts at each other…..we’re one big dysfunctional opinionated family. J
I’m not particularly an Apple fan either.
This was not “Sent from my iPhone” J
From: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com [mailto:newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of John McNamara
Sent: Saturday, June 04, 2011 10:17 PM
To: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com
Cc: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [newmellotrongroup] OK. Here is a tune from the same album
Sorry. I was just hoping for a nasty fight. I will try the aac format, but im not an apple fan. So thats one strike....
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 5, 2011, at 1:10 AM, Gary Brumm <gabru@comsec.net> wrote:
There is nothing to fight about….both formats work fine but some people may have to load iTunes
to play AAC files. Everyone can play mp3s. If I am wrong I am sure someone will correct me. J
From: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com [mailto:newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of John McNamara
Sent: Saturday, June 04, 2011 10:05 PM
To: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com
Cc: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [newmellotrongroup] OK. Here is a tune from the same album
Please fight this out and let me pick through the entrails : )
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 5, 2011, at 12:55 AM, Gary Brumm <gabru@comsec.net> wrote:
AAC may sound a bit brighter at lower encoding rates but at higher rates the is little or no difference. The mp3 format is
more universal and renders a smaller file size.
From: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com [mailto:newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of John McNamara
Sent: Saturday, June 04, 2011 8:41 PM
To: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [newmellotrongroup] OK. Here is a tune from the same album
i'll have to check if audacity/lame supports that. hey, i'll try it...
On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 11:28 PM, <fdoddy@aol.com> wrote:
dump mp3 altogether and go AAC for compressed files. Much sweeter in general than mp3 at any bit rate.
fritz-----Original Message-----
From: John McNamara <jfranmac@gmail.com>
To: newmellotrongroup <newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Sat, Jun 4, 2011 10:32 pm
Subject: Re: [newmellotrongroup] OK. Here is a tune from the same album
Thank you!. I shouldn't be so afraid of 192..... i just dont want to hear the sizzle of the cymbals like you might get on XM....
On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 10:26 PM, Gary Brumm <gabru@comsec.net> wrote:
Sounds great John. If you lower the resolution of the file you should be able to reduce the file size dramatically
and still have good fidelity..
From: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com [mailto:newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of john.mcnamara65
Sent: Saturday, June 04, 2011 7:06 PM
To: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [newmellotrongroup] OK. Here is a tune from the same album
Couldn't post the full song, because it is 33 megs. But this is half of it. You will hear my Moog Rogue, a Yamaha CP70, a Hammond A100 and leslie and gobs of tron. What you won't hear because of file constraints is my tron through a Leslie. : )
https://sites.google.com/site/mrjaisworld/mp3/Fields.mp3?attredirects=0&d=1