| previous by date | index | next by date |
| previous in topic | topic list | next in topic |
On Jun 5, 2011, at 12:55 AM, Gary Brumm <gabru@comsec.net> wrote:
AAC may sound a bit brighter at lower encoding rates but at higher rates the is little or no difference. The mp3 format ismore universal and renders a smaller file size.From: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com [mailto:newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of John McNamara
Sent: Saturday, June 04, 2011 8:41 PM
To: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [newmellotrongroup] OK. Here is a tune from the same albumi'll have to check if audacity/lame supports that. hey, i'll try it...On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 11:28 PM, <fdoddy@aol.com> wrote:dump mp3 altogether and go AAC for compressed files. Much sweeter in general than mp3 at any bit rate.
fritz-----Original Message-----
From: John McNamara <jfranmac@gmail.com>
To: newmellotrongroup <newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Sat, Jun 4, 2011 10:32 pm
Subject: Re: [newmellotrongroup] OK. Here is a tune from the same albumThank you!. I shouldn't be so afraid of 192..... i just dont want to hear the sizzle of the cymbals like you might get on XM....On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 10:26 PM, Gary Brumm <gabru@comsec.net> wrote:Sounds great John. If you lower the resolution of the file you should be able to reduce the file size dramaticallyand still have good fidelity..From: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com [mailto:newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of john.mcnamara65
Sent: Saturday, June 04, 2011 7:06 PM
To: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [newmellotrongroup] OK. Here is a tune from the same albumCouldn't post the full song, because it is 33 megs. But this is half of it. You will hear my Moog Rogue, a Yamaha CP70, a Hammond A100 and leslie and gobs of tron. What you won't hear because of file constraints is my tron through a Leslie. : )
https://sites.google.com/site/mrjaisworld/mp3/Fields.mp3?attredirects=0&d=1