Archive of the former Yahoo!Groups mailing list: The Mellotron Group

previous by date index next by date
previous in topic topic list next in topic

Subject: Re: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Speaking of the M4000

From: Bruce Daily <pocotron@yahoo.com>
Date: 2010-12-02

Oops, I meant number 10.  Addition, not subtraction from Mr. Dickson's list.  Sorry.
 
  -Bruce D.


--- On Wed, 12/1/10, Bruce Daily <pocotron@yahoo.com> wrote:

From: Bruce Daily <pocotron@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Speaking of the M4000, what's with this?
To: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com
Date: Wednesday, December 1, 2010, 10:15 AM

 
Okay, here's another one-
 
  9.  Weight
 
  -which directly transfers to one of its greatest downfalls, NO RESPECT FROM ROADIES OR OTHER TRANSPORTERS.  It only takes one bad trip... 
 
    -Bruce D.
 
 

--- On Wed, 12/1/10, Mike Dickson <mike.dickson@gmail.com> wrote:

From: Mike Dickson <mike.dickson@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [newmellotrongroup] Re: Speaking of the M4000, what's with this?
To: newmellotrongroup@yahoogroups.com
Date: Wednesday, December 1, 2010, 7:20 AM

 

On 01/12/2010 13:20, tron400 wrote:
 
If Mellotrons have limitations, everything has limitations. No one ever mentions the limitations of a guitar or a piano, yet the article mentions Mellotron limitations without saying what they are. What are they?

  1. Tuning
  2. Range
  3. Voices
  4. Recording quality
  5. Timbre
  6. White noise
  7. Tape audio artefacts
  8. Tape transport
  9. Playing position

Give me a shout if you want more.