Actually, I would like to see a 1U panel, no screen-printing,
with eight holes for 1/4 jacks. This would give us flexibility
in how we wire the mults, AND I could use one as a breakout
for my expressionist.
Tomy
David Bivins wrote:
>
> Being a bit vain and snobbish, I ∗would∗ like an "offical" MOTM mult
> regardless of how simple they are. Even if Paul were to only supply
> faceplates with MOTM-consistent graphics, that would be great. I'm using a
> patchbay as a mult now, and though it works fine, I'd love to litter my
> system with several 1U mult panels...
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: davevosh@... [mailto:davevosh@...]
> > Sent: Saturday, August 19, 2000 5:42 PM
> > To: motm@egroups.com
> > Subject: Re: [motm] Food for thought
> >
> >
> > In a message dated 00-08-19 16:39:46 EDT, you write:
> >
> > << Anybody can make a mult
> > or mixer. >>
> >
> >
> > john,
> > while the mult is pretty obvious, mixers can be a more subtle thing.
> > optimised for cv or audio ? one unit to do both or separate
> > modules? each
> > type (vc / audio ) to be super spec`s or just adequate for
> > both ? i think i
> > recall paul speaking on the problems here related to op amp
> > selection and
> > related things - ? not as hard a proposition as a vco maybe
> > but one that has
> > its own pitfalls!
> > best,
> > dave v.
> >
> >
> >
> > --------------------------------------------------------------
> > ------<e|-
> > Best friends, most artistic, class clown Find 'em here:
> > http://click.egroups.com/1/8014/6/_/529958/_/966728514/
> > --------------------------------------------------------------
> > ------|e>-
> >
> >
> >
>
>