No, I think you have it. That's pretty much what I'm describing I guess. Of
course, we don't have a MOTM band-pass filter with modulatable width, so...
But that's a very good point.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Brousseau, Paul E (Paul) [mailto:noise@...]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 05, 2000 11:35 AM
> To: 'motm@egroups.com'
> Subject: RE: [motm] Purchasing decisions
>
>
> I'm not quite clear... how is this different from a band-pass filter with
> modulated Q / width and frequency? Not that it wouldn't be
> really cool, I'm
> just wondering if I'm missing a nuance?
>
> --PBr
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From:David Bivins [SMTP:dbivins@...]
> > Sent:Wednesday, April 05, 2000 9:10 AM
> > To:motm@egroups.com
> > Subject:RE: [motm] Purchasing decisions
> >
> > Just think of how much fun (and how
> > useful) it would be to control both of those expressive
> elements at once!
> > Consider multiplying a keyboard tracking CV and inputting it into FM1 of
> > each filter, with a slightly different offset on each; how
> about the same
> > patch but with a lag processor between one of the CVs and one of the FM
> > inputs! I'm salivating.
> >
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> PERFORM CPR ON YOUR APR!
> Get a NextCard Visa, in 30 seconds! Get rates as low as
> 0.0% Intro or 9.9% Fixed APR and no hidden fees.
> Apply NOW!
> http://click.egroups.com/1/2121/3/_/529958/_/954955989/
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>