On 4/18/07, Jason Proctor put forth:
>one option does present itself - collaboration. if you tell me what
>you want and/or send over some mockups, i can make some FPDs for you.
Thank you, that is both a generous offer, and a very good point.
Although, a collaboration would be a situation that benefits everyone
involved. So perhaps I should discuss which panels I would want, and
see if others are interested.
The first is a modified MOTM-310 panel. While I see no point in
arguing with the original designer at this point in time, people
often have different opinions of what would work best for them. What
I would like is a panel for three knobs (Coarse, Fine, FM), and six
jacks (1V/Oct, Sync, FM, PWM, Saw, Pulse). While I'm sure that I
could buffer the separate waveform outputs with a little
daughterboard such as a MUUB-2, whether or not I can successfully add
sync is unproven. Worse case scenario, I would have an extra jack for
something.
The second is a 1U panel for the CGS65 Tube VCA. While I plan on
modifying the cathode circuitry a bit, I would like to get a panel
that is identical to one half of the panel Richard Brewster used for
his dual unit. Although I'm open to suggestions, having two inputs
is not only useful for feedback as Richard suggests, but for mixing
two separate inputs.
http://www.pugix.com/bottom-cabinet-lower.htm#tubevcahttp://www.cgs.synth.net/modules/cgs65_vca.htmlThe third is a 2U panel for the CGS57 Bi-N-Tic filter. Now, I
realize that Bridechamber offers a panel in MOTM format. However, I
think that linear FM (which is already on the CGS PCB) and and an
output from the counter would be nice features to have. I'm thinking
six knobs for pots (Coarse, Fine, Bandwidth, Resonance, Input 2, FM),
a chickenhead knob for a selector switch for the divided outputs,
nine jacks (FM, 1V/Oct, Sync, Sub Out, VCF Out, In1, 1n2, Saw,
Square), and one switch (AC-lin/DC-lin/Exp FM). The sub-divided
output from the selector switch could be normalled to Input 2.
http://www.cgs.synth.net/modules/cgs57_bintic.html