Thanks for the clarification -- that helps a lot.
So I guess I'm in the market for a couple of Minimoog filter boards now!
(Not that I don't love the 490! And the MOTM-300... and... etc)
skw
On Mar 9, 2006, at 3:06 PM, Geoff wrote:
> The 490 is really built to resemble the Moog modular. There ∗is∗ a
> 'moog sound' that is ∗somewhat∗ common to the modular and the mini,
> but
> they really do have quite distinct sounds. You'll get a 'very close'
> re: the modular and a 'hm... related' re: the mini.
>
> Scott K Warren wrote:
>
> >How close is the sound of the MOTM-490 uVCF to the vintage filters in
> >the Moog modular and the Minimoog? I don't have any Moog filters and
> >I'm sure my ear isn't good enough to hear the difference anyway
> >(software guy, not musician), but I'm curious what people think.
> >
> >This is not to start an AH-style "which filter is better" thread. I
> >just happened to acquire a couple of Minimoog oscillator boards for
> my
> >MOTM modular to assimilate, and I am wondering how close I'll be to
> the
> >fabled Minimoog sound if I run them through MOTM-490's and use other
> >MOTM modules for the remaining voice functions. Paul S's blurb says
> the
> >490 captures all the subtle characteristics of the original, and as
> far
> >as I know Paul is always right!
> >
> >Inquiring minds want to know,
> >
> >skw
> >
> >
>
>
>
> YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
>
> ▪ Visit your group "motm" on the web.
>
> ▪ To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
> motm-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
> ▪ Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of
> Service.
>
>