At 5:33 PM +0100 11/12/02, Aaron Day wrote:
>
>I second this. Having a DIN sync somewhere on a panel would be great for
>playing with other people that have x0x boxes. I love my little 606 but
>loathe having another "box" to make it talk to other machines. Seems the
>>101 is as good of place as any.
Yes, that makes. A way to do this would be to use the 101 internal clock
(or any MOTM pulse) at 24 times the frequency for DIN, they divide it down
with the 500 pulse divider (which I hope goes up to 24 =:O) and then stick
the divider clock back into the 101 external clock input.
It is much easier to divide clocks than to multiply clocks.
Any, I plan on keeping my Pro-4, and maybe even putting together a KADI
breakout panel (are there any Stooge Kenton panels?? It seems likely as
Kenton converters are on the Synthesis Technology website).
I also decided to go with the 40U case.
And I still have no idea what Todd meant :)
>> At 9:20 AM -0800 11/10/02, Tentochi wrote:
>>>> Since I already have a 1U rackmount MIDI-->CV
>>>> converter which I need to
>>>> keep because it has DIN sync, I'm not planning on
>>>> buying a 650.
>>>
>>> Wouldn't it be possible to have a small convertor
>>> cable (phono to DIN) to allow DIN Sync (24 or 48) if
>>> the software outputs the proper signals???
>>
>> Huh??