Archive of the former Yahoo!Groups mailing list: Korg Poly800/EX800 Users

previous by date index next by date
previous in topic topic list next in topic

Subject: Re: [korgpolyex] AtomaHawk - new hardware version in final testing

From: Michael Hawkins <korgpolyex800@...>
Date: 2016-06-10

Q: Glad to hear the Ploy 800 and mods are not dead, would upgrades be compatible with the hawk/atomahawk already fitted?

A: Not sure about the AtomaHawk because I may redesign it entirely. Definitely not the HAWK because we would be replacing it entirely.

/Mike



From: "Louis Botterill chillipower.uk@... [korgpolyex]" <korgpolyex@yahoogroups.com>
To: korgpolyex@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, June 8, 2016 2:42 PM
Subject: Re: [korgpolyex] AtomaHawk - new hardware version in final testing

 
SMD for the win. When I started working I started out designing circuits and a lot was becoming SMT. Tiny 0402 components and several hundred leg QFPs were all around. I used to really like it, although routing by hand was tricky for really dense boards. We had a pick and place machine the size of a house that used to rattle through placing parts on boards like it was possessed. Funny thing to watch when that went wrong, literally thousands of tiny components all stacked up in a big mess in a split second, all destined for the bin once off the feed rolls.

One thing I did note, when designing high freq rf circuits the SMT really helped with the circuit characteristics.

All good fun, now I don't do any of that but still have fond memories. Glad you gave it a go. Slightly different techniques for designing, building and re-working SMT boards but it's all largely the same. I was able to swap out a several hundred pin QFP sometimes just with a basic iron and not even a hot air gun. Super fiddly and have to be careful removing off the board without destroying, but possible all the same! 

Glad to hear the Ploy 800 and mods are not dead, would upgrades be compatible with the hawk/atomahawk already fitted?


On 6 June 2016 at 01:50, Michael Hawkins korgpolyex800@... [korgpolyex] <korgpolyex@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
 
Ha ha! Yes, I was very pleasantly surprised at how easy it is. I am actually kicking myself for not having tried surface mount ten years ago. Stupid really. But I guess you get used to what you're doing and sometimes you don't want to change what works.

But in this case, going to surface mount has some challenges but they can all be overcome. As long as the board isn't too big or uses the really small SMD components.

The AD5290 is a TSSOp which is very small to handle with tweezers. It can be positioned but it is really difficult. So I am making a jig that will help me to place it. I shall let you know how that goes.

But as always Gordon, your questions are always a strong indication of your insight. So why the heck didn't you tell me to try SMD earlier? Eh?

/Mike



From: "Gordonjcp gordon@... [korgpolyex]" <korgpolyex@yahoogroups.com>
To: "Michael Hawkins korgpolyex800@... [korgpolyex]" <korgpolyex@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Sunday, June 5, 2016 6:07 PM
Subject: Re: [korgpolyex] AtomaHawk - new hardware version in final testing

 
On Sun, Jun 05, 2016 at 03:45:14PM +0000, Michael Hawkins korgpolyex800@... [korgpolyex] wrote:
> So, I went looking for a new through hole chip that could be used but alas I was completely unable to find one. What I did find was a far better device but it is only available in surface mount. I finally had to go through the process of figuring out how hard (or not) it is to create surface mount boards in small quantities.

... and you found it's actually way, way easier than through-hole?

--
Gordonjcp MM0YEQ






--
Web: www.chillipower.com
Blog: http://louisbotterill.blogspot.com/
Twitter: http://twitter.com/BinaryJunkie
LinkedIn: http://uk.linkedin.com/pub/louis-botterill/10/3b2/265

“The trouble with the world is that the stupid are cocksure and the intelligent are full of doubt.” –Bertrand Russell

Please consider your environmental responsibility before printing this e-mail