Archive of the former Yahoo!Groups mailing list: Korg Poly800/EX800 Users

previous by date index next by date
previous in topic topic list  

Subject: Re: [korgpolyex] hmmm.

From: Donal Finn <terrible.dee@...>
Date: 2015-09-11

You mentioned the JP8000 and Ms2000 as being 'groove box"electro type boards and one thing the 106 really has going for t is it can really slide in with those aggressive type boards and not miss a beat.

I think the106 is highly under rated in the "mean, dirty and nasty" department

The Polly8 needs a little more massaging but can also rock with those types of boards too.

I wish I had a DW to demo, listening to someone else play only goes so far

On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 4:12 AM, backshall1@... [korgpolyex] <korgpolyex@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
 

We are not talking about any ‘70s machines here. Juno 106 is 1984 and DW-8000 is 1985. Of course, the ‘80s had so many synth innovations that it really seems like several eras of different sounds. The Juno has that raw analog-type sound with just sawtooth and square/pulse waves while the DW-8000 has 16 more complex waveforms which are perfect for those pads you mentioned. For a raw saw/square/pulse six-voice poly synth, I’ll stick with my Polysix with six real analog oscillators. Those six will probably never be in tune but that just makes every Polysix unique.
 
Don B.
 
Sent: Friday, September 11, 2015 5:12 AM
Subject: Re: [korgpolyex] hmmm.
 
 

Well.. these machines are from different era's. I love the intuitiveness from the 70 machines and it makes you really understand what you're doing with sound. I suppose a lot of people who have had their first encounter with these machines are hooked forever. I have no problem with the same level of control on a MIDI enabled synth like the Hawk800 or DW8000 via a controller pad or DAW.

Main thing is you turn them on and the sound like they should. In that respect they both have deserved their status. Juno is a killer on electro funk, DW8000 is perfect for the 80s pad sounds and thats where I'm aiming for.