| previous by date | index | next by date |
| previous in topic | topic list | next in topic |
On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 10:23 AM, Michael Hawkins korgpolyex800@... [korgpolyex] <korgpolyex@yahoogroups.com> wrote:no, sorry I don't/Mike
From: "Gordonjcp gordon@... [korgpolyex]" <korgpolyex@yahoogroups.com>
To: "Michael Hawkins korgpolyex800@... [korgpolyex]" <korgpolyex@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Tuesday, September 8, 2015 11:29 AM
Subject: Re: [korgpolyex] hmmm.
On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 03:22:16PM +0000, Michael Hawkins korgpolyex800@... [korgpolyex] wrote:
> The DW-8000 has a bunch of things that the Poly-800 should have had. But the DW-8000 still has many annoying limitations that the Poly-800 also had. One or two LFO's with only a few ways to modulate.The waveform generation of the DW-8000 - although better than the Poly - still doesn't give you much control over phase. PWM - true independent detuning and true independent modulation of all oscillators - all missing. The MIDI implementation is a lot better than Poly but still quirky enough to make it painful. The arpeggiator is standard fare without anything special. Though I do like the DW-8000, and 300 Euro's is pretty good for an EX-8000.
>
Hmm, that's kind of got me thinking. I don't suppose you've got wave ROM dumps for the DW8000, do you?
--
Gordonjcp MM0YEQ