| previous by date | index | next by date |
| previous in topic | topic list |
Definetly arpeggiator, with latch as the other Korgs.
The sequencer is not usefull imo ...
--- In korgpolyex@yahoogroups.com, <korgpolyex800@...> wrote:The HAWK already has a sequencer transpose function.
Mike
From: misha.aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa <b.mlaster@...>
To: korgpolyex@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, August 15, 2013 9:12 AM
Subject: [korgpolyex] Re: HAWK - sequencer or arpeggiator - you choose
I see it a late post, but want to add opinion. I vote for programmable arpeggiator. Maybe it is possible to make a sequencer transpose to notes when you in seq mode?
--- In korgpolyex@yahoogroups.com, Michael Hawkins <korgpolyex800@...> wrote:
>
> At this point, the HAWK has been a wonderful project. I've met alot of great people from all over the world. Most of you would have noticed that development of the HAWK software has slowed down to almost none at all. However, I would still like to put an arpeggiator into the HAWK. To do that I would like to ask you all if you would mind if I took the old step sequencer out entirely. I doubt many of you use the sequencer at all. But before I pursue that direction, I thought I would ask all HAWK owners if they would mind if the sequencer was removed.
>
> Let me know,
>
> Mike
>