| previous by date | index | next by date |
| previous in topic | topic list | next in topic |
On 2012-08-05, at 2:01 PM, "bimmerfan222" <bperkins211@...> wrote:
It's my understanding by comparing schematics/parts between a M1/M2 that the raw sound is exactly the same. IE, if you turn FX off of both a M1/M2 and play the same exact patch/set parameters, you couldnt tell the difference in how they sound.
M2's typically sell for about 300+ on ebay vs. a M1 goes for about 200. You save money on both the Keyboard/HAWK kit and extra installation steps.
If you already have a digital delay/reverb unit, you wont be missing out on the extra FX... you could make a M1 sound very similar to the M2. That a no brainer ;)
There is a difference in the sequencers between an unmodded M1 and M2.. but after a HAWK mod on both, they are both the same. That part I missed in my earlier post.
-Blaine
--- In korgpolyex@yahoogroups.com, w.james.meagher@... wrote:
>
> Thanks Blaine - that was an extremely detailed reply.
>
> Should I believe then that there is no actual perceivable difference in basic tone between the two? I shouldn't worry about getting the MkII and thinking it's not as punchy or sparkly or whatever as the MkI?
>
> James
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>