Archive of the former Yahoo!Groups mailing list: Korg Poly800/EX800 Users

previous by date index next by date
previous in topic topic list next in topic

Subject: Re: [korgpolyex] Re: Moog Slayer pots question

From: Michael Hawkins <korgpolyex800@...>
Date: 2010-04-09

HI Tim,

as Everett points out, I have several customers that installed the HAWK-800 and AtomaHawk into their already moog slayer modified Poly-800's.

Both upgrade kits were designed to be installed without disturbing an existing moog slayer mod.

Mike

From: tim.tashpulatov <tim.tashpulatov@...>
To: korgpolyex@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Fri, April 9, 2010 1:35:27 AM
Subject: [korgpolyex] Re: Moog Slayer pots question

 

Mike,

Thank you for clarification. Does it mean that upon installing HAWK800 upgrade one no longer could use Moog Slayer mod?

--- In korgpolyex@yahoogro ups.com, Michael Hawkins <korgpolyex800@ ...> wrote:
>
> Tim,
>
> The HAWK-800 and AtomaHawk kits combined control Moog Slayer (which is really just extreme resonance).
>
> But no, the Moog Slayer pots do not need to be three wire.
>
> Mike
>
>
>
>
> ____________ _________ _________ __
> From: tim.tashpulatov <tim.tashpulatov@ ...>
> To: korgpolyex@yahoogro ups.com
> Sent: Thu, April 8, 2010 5:16:32 AM
> Subject: [korgpolyex] Moog Slayer pots question
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> I wonder if the two pots for the Moog Slayer mod should really be of 3-pin type.
>
> My point is that I've got a digital resistor chip from AD, and it features two channels (or 'digital pots'). One has 3 pins, and the other is 2-pin only. The idea was to use this chip to control the Moog Slayer parameters programmatically.
>
> Thanks!
>