Nice, just maybe this different order would be more easy to remember
and to use than yours purely binar:
16' 8' 4' 2'
08 = X
04 = X
02 = X
01 = X
12 = X X
10 = X X
09 = X X
06 = X X
05 = X X
03 = X X
14 = X X X
13 = X X X
11 = X X X
07 = X X X
15 = X X X X
I left your original numbers for comparison, but of course numbering
should go from 01 to 15 again.
Daniel Forro
On 5 Jul 2009, at 11:49 PM, korgpolyex800 wrote:
> Hi HAWK-800 owners,
>
> I have a question for you all.
>
> I am about to put LFO/EG control of DCO harmonics into the
> HAWK-800. However, due to the reduced number of available
> parameters, I am thinking about combining the harmonics parameters
> into one parameter. That is, parameters 13 to 16 would all be
> combined into 13. And, parameters 23 to 26 would be combined into
> 23 also.
>
> Then, parameters 13 and 23 would have available values 0 through
> 15. 1 through 15 would engage the DCO harmonics in a fixed manner
> using binary math to determine the actual engaged harmonics.
>
> So the harmonics would be engaged as follows where X means the
> harmonic is ON:
>
> 16' 8' 4' 2'
> 01 = X
> 02 = X
> 03 = X X
> 04 = X
> 05 = X X
> 06 = X X
> 07 = X X X
> 08 = X
> 09 = X X
> 10 = X X
> 11 = X X X
> 12 = X X
> 13 = X X X
> 14 = X X X
> 15 = X X X X
>
> This arrangement provides a couple of advantages. First, it frees
> up the next three parameters for other purposes. Second, it allows
> MIDI and user parameter control of the harmonics in one parameter
> which will provide real time improvement over control of the
> harmonics.
>
> Most important though, the next three parameters will be able to be
> used for new harmonic controls.
>
> Parameter 14/24 will be the LFO or EG3 modulation selector.
> Parameter 15/25 will be the harmonic order selector.
> Parameter 16/26 will be the harmonic velocity sensitivity selector.
>
> I'll go into the details of those later but right now, is everyone
> OK with dropping the single harmonic selector parameters and using
> a combined parameter for all four harmonics?
>
> Mike.