On Wed, 17 Sep 2008, korgpolyex800 wrote:
> I knew someone would eventually suggest over clocking the CPU.
===============
i didn't mean to imply that. i'm not eager to cook anything in my old
gear.
> The only problem with that is that those old CPU's had a maximum clock
> rate that really was the maximum clock rate. And that is the principle
> that applies to the old 80C85.
=================
maximum clock rate is, too a point, a function of temperature. but no, i
don't want to have a liquid nitrogen cooled EX800.
> Look up tables are used for the sine wave. But I found that the fast
> code for triangle, saw, random and PWM was to use real code.
==================
i would still think that it would be feasible to use a distorted wave in a
lookup table and get "ohmygod" fast LFOs, without burdening the CPU... but
i'll take your word for it if that's not the case.
as a crypto geek, i'm still curious how you're calculating the random
wave, and what the period is.
--
...atom
________________________
http://atom.smasher.org/ 762A 3B98 A3C3 96C9 C6B7 582A B88D 52E4 D9F5 7808
-------------------------------------------------
"Never have the armies of the North brought peace,
prosperity, or democracy to the peoples of Asia,
Africa, or Latin America. In the future, as in the
past five centuries, they can only bring to these
peoples further servitude, the exploitation of their
labor, the expropriation of their riches, and the denial
of their rights. It is of the utmost importance that the
progressive forces of the West understand this."
-- Samir Amin,
director of Forum du Tiers Monde in Dakar, Senegal