There's also possibility not to use neighboring values but divide 128
values by concrete number of steps for each parameter, like this:
0/1: 0= 0-63, 1=64-127
0-7: 0=0-15, 1=16-31, 2=32-47 ... ... 7=112-127
0-15: 0=0-7, 1=8-15 ... ... 15=120-127
0-31:0=0-3, 1=4-7 ... ... 31=124-127
Small problem can be with odd values. For example 0-2: 0=0-42,
1=43-84, 2=85-127
This would be very comfortable and intuitive for physical control
from rotary pots or sliders.
Daniel Forro
On Jun 3, 2008, at 5:10 AM, Atom Smasher wrote:
> On Mon, 2 Jun 2008, korgpolyex800 wrote:
>
>> So I was thinking about assigning controller 22 to be a parameter
>> bank
>> select. Controller 22 would use a range of values from 0-16 (anything
>> above 16 would be ignored). Then Controllers 23 to 31 would be
>> parameter
>> controllers for parameter 0 through 7.
> ...
>> What does everyone think of that method?
> ===============
>
> overall, it sounds great. for people who don't have a PC1600, might
> there
> be a way to use the display to show what group of parameters is
> selected... "En1", "LFO2", "OSC2", "FILTER", etc? i'm thinking it
> would be
> great if that flashed on the display for 2-3 seconds, or until a
> parameter
> is edited.
>
> also, for people who don't have a PC1600, maybe CC22 should ignore
> the low
> bits; if i had to use my evolution (MK249c) to select 0-16 with a
> small
> knob that has a range of 0-127 it would kinda suck. ignoring the
> low bits
> (and using the high bits) would give better control in that situation.
> best of all would be adding a second CC to adjust the "edit bank" (or
> whatever you want to call it); one that works as you described (for
> software and PC1600's) and one that works as i described, for most
> hardware controllers.
>
> i haven't gone over the rest of the math, but that's my biggest
> concern
> and it's not that big, since i have a PC1600x.
>
>
> --
> ...atom
>
> ________________________
> http://atom.smasher.org/
> 762A 3B98 A3C3 96C9 C6B7 582A B88D 52E4 D9F5 7808
> -------------------------------------------------
>
> "Somebody has to take governments' place, and business
> seems to me to be a logical entity to do it."
> -- David Rockefeller
> Newsweek International, 1 Feb 1999.
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------
>
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>