Archive of the former Yahoo!Groups mailing list: Korg Poly800/EX800 Users

previous by date index next by date
previous in topic topic list next in topic

Subject: Re: [korgpolyex] Re: Mod questions

From: "David Mochen" <davidmochen@...>
Date: 2007-03-28

Yes, the mistake is the removal of the C103 and inverting polarity.
The 100k pot will allow a transition between filter slopes. I wouldn't implement it myself since most usual way in history of synths has been toggling between them rather than fading... A pot takes up more room as well than a switch.
 
 
Dave
 
 
----- Original Message -----
From: satnom2000
To: korgpolyex@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2007 1:07 PM
Subject: [korgpolyex] Re: Mod questions

--- In korgpolyex@yahoogro ups.com, "David Mochen" <davidmochen@ ...> wrote:
>
> Hi Satnom. As for the audio input, Marco's explanation will do. I
havent got here the exact link i follwoed (it was one old post in this
same NG). When I get home ill email it to you.

Thank you. I appreciate.

>
> However, as regards 12/24, please check one of my latest posts,
since the post linked in Marco's page has a mistake that will render
the synth virtually mute AFAIK....

Is the mistake is to remove all of the C103, I think we have to just
cut the positive leg, Am I right? And also, what do you think of this
idea of mounting a 100k pot in place of the switch?

> YOu'll find a diagram for 12/24 in my post. REal easy.

I already got it. Thanks again and sorry for all those questions.

Bernard